I thought it would be fun to “probe” my B table using the paper touch off method to see how square and repeatable things are. I put the 1/8" dowel in the spindle and touched it off to set the TLO, then set A to 90 and checked 4 “corners”, rotated B 180, checked roughly the same 4 corners, then dropped A back to 0 and spun the B around and touched off w/ Y every 90 degrees.
Here are my results:
- Bottom left: -0.8317, -0.8313
- Top left: -0.8280, -0.8282
- Top right: -0.8299, -0.8297
- Bottom right: -0.8328, -0.8328
- Bottom left: -0.8314
- Top left: -0.8275
- Top right: -0.8308
- Bottom right: -0.8344
- B0: -0.8367
- B90: -0.8364
- B180: -0.8373
- B270: -0.8364
My manual lists .8364 as the B table offset.
I did the first set of measurements twice, the second time after moving Z all the way + and then back to see how repeatable the motion is and how consistent my paper touch-off is.
Pretty interesting results, the A0 results are very close to the reported value in the manual, but w/ A90 things were off by up almost 10 thou in some cases This could definitely explain some issues I’m having leaving 5 thou stock in one op and then facing in another, but getting raw stock remaining w/ A set to 90.
The machine is fairly new, I got it in May. I certainly have had a few bumps, but nothing too crazy, maybe I’ve put something out of whack, or maybe there’s something off w/ the tool probing.
I’d be curious to hear from PNC if this is about as expected, and it would be fun if anyone else wants to try this and share their results.